Every new employee at Red Hat quickly learns about memo-list, one of the most visible elements of the Red Hat culture. Memo-list is a mailing list that we subscribe everyone in the organization to, and historically we used memo-list for anything from making important announcements to discussing company strategy to sharing jokes.
At times over the years, we considered moving memo-list from a relatively low-tech email mailing list to an online discussion forum or a web-based collaboration tool. But ultimately we stuck with the mailing list, in large part because everyone is subscribed, so everyone sees every message. It is an extremely democratic platform for discussion.
In fact, memo-list is a crucial element of the meritocratic culture of Red Hat because it gives every employee an equal opportunity and equal voice to express thoughts, ideas, and opinions.
As the company expanded from a start up to a large organization with more than 50 offices around the world and more than 3000 employees, memo-list conversations multiplied and in recent years we noticed that the signal-to-noise ratio went up. With the sheer amount of communication overwhelming email boxes, many employees no longer viewed it as a valuable resource. We were coming to a bit of a crisis. Something had to change.
Where did Red Hat turn for answers? Rather than turn to an outside consultant or senior management, we asked a group of employees who cared deeply about memo-list to build the plan to help it evolve.
But the downsides became apparent and became more accentuated as we grew larger. In this unmoderated email anarchy, personal attacks were common and flamewars were expected. Indeed, the controversial comments or links sent out on Fridays, with subject lines like “It’s Friday and…” or “Friday Flames” were a regular feature of memo-list.
At their best, the heated debates encouraged passion and brought out valuable new ideas. At their worst, they spread misinformation, were distracting, or were demoralizing to many in the company.
And then there was the sheer amount of email. Years ago, new hires were stunned to open their new email accounts and see page after page of memo-list replies. Many of these conversations seemed (or were) completely unrelated to Red Hat's business.
This led some to believe memo-list was a colossal waste of company time. Many an exasperated associate would respond to these mile-long threads with, “Don't you have any work to do?” and “Why can't we unsubscribe from memo-list?”
When I first joined Red Hat as an attorney in the Legal Affairs group, I questioned the value of memo-list myself and the amount of time people spent reading and writing notes on it. But when my role changed, ultimately into my current role as Chief People Officer, I began to see its tremendous value. Memo-list gave employees a place to express their true feelings and it gave Red Hat's management team the gift of honest feedback. I for one was happier seeing feedback on memo-list so that we knew what is going on in our associates' minds. If people have a concern, they are going to express it in some manner. It is better to have an internal debate than to have the criticism behind closed doors or in outside forums.
Over the years, Red Hat employees advised each other on ways to tame the memo-list email thread. They set up their inboxes to list email by thread, rather than chronologically. They filtered out memo-list messages to a separate folder. But it didn't solve the bigger problem.
Members of our senior management team spent a significant amount of time discussing what to do with memo-list. Given the issues, the only simple option the leadership team could see was to take it down. But this was not a culturally viable solution.
Figuring out how to evolve memo-list was a challenging issue for Red Hat. On the positive side, memo-list was a vehicle that connected employees to each other around the world and created a shared understanding of our business, values, and culture. It gave every employee a channel from which to provide feedback and was a powerful meritocratic force that could (and often did) facilitate change and increase accountability.
On the other hand, it was also a venue where personal attacks could get out of hand, where conversations could quickly become demoralizing, where misstatements helped to proliferate inaccurate information, and it could be deeply polarizing. Some viewed it as a symbol of Red Hat culture, while others perceived it as a waste of valuable time.
Here are a few key challenges that came up during the effort to transform memo-list:
- Problem: Not everyone agreed on what success would look like. In a company of 3000+ people, there were diverse ideas for what a successful evolution of memo-list would look like.
Solution: By recruiting a cross-section of people from different parts of the company, we were able to bring together many different viewpoints to help build the prototype. This ensured that the prototype we presented to the company would have a good chance of being embraced. It was.
- Problem: Those with extremely strong opinions about memo-list were often the loudest voices, drowning out the opinions of those who weren’t as vocal.
Solution: The surveys gave voice to the silent opinions and gave us data that allowed us to see beyond just the opinions of the loudest voices.
- Problem: Ensuring people actually followed the new guidelines.
Solution: Many of the volunteers for the task force also took on policing roles after the new guidelines were launched. Fairly soon, memo-list rules were being enforced broadly by the memo-list community, not just by the people on the team, and most people now follow the guidelines on their own. But because the community was deeply involved in the creation of the guidelines, the policing effort has been easier than expected.
- Problem: How to find the right balance between information source and a lively community. If memo-list was used strictly for announcements-- all business and no discussion-- it would lose some of its value as a tool for building a cohesive employee community. Yet, if the discussion became too lively or not business-like enough, some people would begin to tune it out.
Solution: While the guidelines we've mentioned previously did a nice job of keeping things in balance, we've also tried to allow for some flexibility as well. So when important moments in the culture of the company occur, memo-list becomes more of a gathering place and the conversation flows somewhat freer. For example, when the company was listed on the New York Stock Exchange, there was a lively discussion on memo-list, celebrating how far we had come together as a company. It was a great moment that brought everyone together.
While everyone in Red Hat is still subscribed to memo-list, the new and optional friday-list has about 20% of the company subscribed. In the last month before the new guidelines took effect, there were 892 posts on memo-list. During the first five months of 2011, more than two years since friday-list and the guidelines were created, the number of monthly posts has dropped by more than half, averaging between 300-400 posts per month. But the voices have not been silenced—much of the extra conversation has now moved over to friday-list, which averages about 150-300 posts per month.
So those who wanted to see the “noise level” on memo-list drop have had their wish come true, while those who wanted to ensure the lively and fun conversation would continue have had their wish come true as well via friday-list.
Here are a few pieces of feedback the team received after the changes were put in place:
“I realize that memo-list was hanging by a thread there for a bit, and I’d like to take the time to personally thank you for spending time on this, instead of letting it die. Memo-list is an important part of our company.”
“…so far, so good. Posts to memo-list seem to be mostly related to our business, and posts to friday-list seem to be mostly wider topics that are not directly related to the Red Hat mission. I was skeptical, but my initial attitude is eroding.”
Memo-list remains a critical piece of the Red Hat culture. While it is now centered almost exclusively on business-related issues, people still feel empowered to express their views, and many executives—including the CEO—are regular contributors. While these new policies did change some things, we did so in a way that preserved the greater cultural value of the list, and this continues to pay dividends.
As for friday-list—an optional, just-for-fun list—it is living up to its mission. It gives people an outlet to express themselves, to share ideas and humor, to get to know each other in a less formal way. It connects people—including people working remotely by themselves—with each other and with the rest of the company, and it creates a sense of community among subscribed employees (especially the bacon lovers, as bacon is one of the favorite topics on friday-list).
I’d like to thank Michelle Thompson, Manager of Internal Communications at Red Hat, for her leadership on the memo-list project. Her passion for ensuring the team reached a great result was the driving force behind our success.
In addition, I’d like to thank all of the members of the memo-list working team, especially Andrew Dinn, Kim Jokisch, Beth Kelly, Doug Ledford, Jon Masters, Sue Moynihan, Nick Otto, Devang Parikh, David Spalding, Rick Statile, Rik van Riel, and Jan Wildeboer. These people invested their time and energy to help solve a problem that could have never been solved by one person alone and to do so in a manner that embodied the Red Hat and open source spirit.