It's time to reinvent management. You can help.

Forget Empowerment—Aim for Exhilaration

by Polly LaBarre on April 25, 2012

Humanocracy

polly-labarre's picture

Forget Empowerment—Aim for Exhilaration

There is no doubt that there is tremendous goodwill, not to mention countless exciting experiments, when it comes to making the world of work more deeply human—designed to promote more freedom, equity, and engagement, and passion. Why, then, can those words sound so cheap and drained of their juice when we hear them repeated over and over by leaders of all stripes? Probably because they’re spoken so much more often than they’re ever enacted.

That’s why it’s so very refreshing to spend time with a leader who is relentlessly inventive and impressively effective as a champion of the fullest expression of humanity at work. We aim too low, says Ricardo Semler, the irrepressible force behind Brazil’s Semco Group. “We constantly talk about passion—serving customers passionately, filling in forms passionately—but what if we created the conditions for people to feel exhilaration, to get involved to the point they shout ‘yes!’ and give each other high fives because they did if their way and it worked?” What if, instead of assuming passion will just show up when we invoke it, we focused on designing organizations to unleash human flourishing?

For the last thirty years, Semco has operated as a kind of lab for experimenting on what it takes to build working lives characterized by exhilaration and fulfillment. From its founding as a manufacturer of centrifuges for the vegetable oils industry, Semco has grown into a collection of companies—from real estate to inventory services to industrial equipment and document management—held together less by what business they are in than how they go about their business.

Since the mid-80s when Semler arrived on the scene, that has meant an ever-evolving experiment in upending the organizational status quo: no organizational chart, no fixed offices or working hours, no fixed CEO, no HR department, no five-year plan (or two- or one-year-plan), no job descriptions or permanent positions, no approvals necessary—and an endless array of clever practices and initiatives to increase individual autonomy and agency, participation at every level, trust, and informality.

The result? Market success—Semco is private but Semler reports average annual revenue growth at 40% and profitability. But probably just as telling is the human impact—careers and talents unleashed. Leaders from all over the world have flocked to Semco’s door for the past twenty years to learn from its unconventional approach (nearly 80 universities have published Semco case studies and Semler’s own book, Maverick, has sold over a million copies).

I caught up with Semler during his three month sojourn with his family at his beach house in northwestern Brazil (appropriate for a man whose second book is titled “The Seven-Day Weekend”). One of Semler’s more recent leadership innovations has been to kick himself out of the day-to-day management of Semco in order to focus on an array of pursuits including reinventing primary education and disrupting the legal industry with a 21st-century take on legal services. We talked to the sound of jungle birds and waves (alas, via Skype, not in person) and he unpacked some lessons learned when it comes to turning work into what he calls “a seven-day weekend of fulfillment.”

Don’t try to find balance—cultivate equilibrium

The “seven-day weekend” isn’t an invitation to an elaborate game of hooky. Rather, it’s about creating an environment that encourages “employees to be men and women in full for seven days a week,” says Semler.

For all of the good intentions and energy applied these days to re-thinking the five-day, nine-to-five grind, all too often the quest for work-life balance, flexibility, and “empowerment” results in more programs, policies, rules, top-heavy design. At Semco, the two ruling assumptions are: 1) “trust in adult behavior”—the basic human drive to be productive, to build toward the future, and to contribute to something larger than themselves, and 2) every person’s rhythm’s are different when it comes to when and where and how they do their best work.

Whether that means the young, high-flying founder of Semco’s high-tech ventures unit works twelve-plus hour days but also finds time for regular lunches with his girlfriend and intense spectatorship of every tennis tournament, or a shop floor manager who takes off the day before a new project launch to spend time in reflection at home, “we want people to work on a structure of their own,” says Semler. “You don’t have to show up at a certain time, and you can change your pattern at anytime. We don’t want to see you at the office—we don’t even have a head office. The day that we measured people by time clocked is long gone. What make sense now is to set up a few parameters for what we’re expecting from you and vice versa. We don’t want to know when or how you’re working, but if you’re fulfilling your commitment.”

There are no rules when it comes to finding balance. What Semler is after is that uniquely human equilibrium that comes from the right mix of challenging, meaningful work and truly rejuvenating pursuits (as opposed to enervating leisure). That’s the best ground for producing life’s true highs—the exhilaration Semler argues is the whole point of the exercise.

Relentlessly relinquish control—and make room for discovery

All of Semco’s experiments are geared toward “returning control to our people over a very important piece of real estate—their destiny,” says Semler. He and his colleague are ruthless when it comes to clearing people’s paths of the “waste and distraction in all the logistics, the getting around, the sitting in meetings, and the overhead that defines ‘normal’ work.”

Semco’s experiments in cutting out the bureaucratic clutter include “Up’n’Down Pay” (an adaptable system of flexible pay and work hours to accommodate different stages and circumstance in an employee’s life supported by an active database of job-sharing and –switching candidates), “Rush Hour MBA” (a program that uses two hours of high-traffic commuting time into a volunteer-led study session), and “Retire-a-Little,” (a radical design for rethinking the traditional career by building retirement into work and work into retirement with a clever exchange of time off for life pursuits mid-career for the opportunity to do some meaningful work in later years).

But Semler isn’t simply interested in generating freedom from the constraints of the time clock, the cube, and bureaucratic policies—he’s intent on cultivating the freedom to discover your destiny. That’s why Semco welcomes “trespassers” (individuals, from interns and assistants to heads of businesses to check out meetings and projects as far afield as they fancy) and promotes a “ramble when bored” approach (a very loose and self-directed job-rotation program). “Interests tend to be cyclical,” says Semler. “If people are moving around following their internal radar, they’ll dip into their reservoir of talent and develop independence.”

Now, all of this freedom doesn’t mean life at Semco is chaos. There’s a crucial regulatory mechanism. Your cohort of colleagues (the eight to ten to twelve people you work most closely with at any given point) decides  whether to include you in the next six-month budget or not. That’s it. “You could have met your targets but still, six out of eight people you work with might not put you on the list as a person they need in the next six months. Then you’re in trouble,” says Semler. It’s admittedly unscientific, but brutally effective. “It’s much easier convincing a boss or shareholders, but getting included constantly every six months as someone everyone wants to work with is much tougher.”

Always ask “Why?”—and then ask it again, and again

If Semco has any signal strategy, it’s to simply ask “Why?” Semler calls it the “Three Whys.” In just about any situation, “we simply ask ‘Why?’ three times in a row. ‘Why do you do things the way you do? Why is it important for people to come in at the same time? Why is it important for meetings to happen in a certain way?’ You keep asking why and you generally get to the answer, ‘it is what it is.’ And when people realize they’re stuck in a mode they really can’t explain, this works wonders in breaking down resistance and opening up new possibilities.”

It also works wonders in that dreaded and inescapable ritual of working life, the meeting. At Semco, all meetings start by asking “why we agreed to what we agreed to last time,” says Semler. “We don’t have minutes. We just start by recounting what we decided and why—and depending who’s in the room, sometimes the whole thing falls apart. And sometimes we all nod and agree and move on. But we never move on just because a meeting or minutes indicate we should.”

Semler admits “it’s not very comfortable for anyone.” But that’s exactly the point. When people are not only free, but actively encouraged, to question, to get up and leave a meeting that bores them, to bop into a meeting that interests them, and to push back on previous conclusions, you actually have a chance to get to the heart of the matter, to escape ruts, and to do something that’s worth doing. That’s the spirit of Semco’s regular “Are You Nuts?” meetings, where only the most outlandish ideas are seriously considered.

What are you doing to make your business just a little nuttier? How are you pushing yourself and your people out of the inevitable ruts? Share your stories in the comments.

 

 

 

You need to register in order to submit a comment.

kamal-ladha's picture

Are there groups that follow the findings and experiences of SEMCO. I am looking for a group in the US an INDIA.
Thanks for any help in this area....

david-marquet_1's picture

Empowerment isn't the answer. As humans we are fundamentally empowered already. It's like saying "giving life." What we do is give decision making authority and control to allow people to act on their empowerment.

Ultimately, it's about giving control, not taking control.

leader-leader.com/blog

greg-stevenson's picture

One of the things I got out of reading Maverick was Ricardo's insistence that Semco was not a "family".
I contrast this against Walmart's insistence that they were a 2 million strong "family".
Semco embraces unionism whilst Walmart prohibits unionism.

The other point to note is Ricardo's shift to primary school education. This is a real pragmatist approach. Making the type of cultural change that Semco represents is Difficult, time consuming, and expensive. http://blog.kahatika.com/difficult-time-consuming-expensive/ . It is better for you and me to die, or at the very least, be too old for the workforce, than to try to change our entrenched views. (At the time of Einstein's death only a handful of people understood Special Relativity) My Question is; Do we have time for this strategy? Especially when Ricardo's work with Primary Schools is by no means mainstream. The existence of the Management Exchange is encouraging, albeit dwarfed by the task in hand.

Evangelistic fervour to induce the required cultural change within our organisations and society at large may not be fast enough to avoid calamity. Logically we therefore require systems that induce cultural change, more easily, faster, and cheaply. That is what I'm working on.

carlos-largacha-martinez's picture

Polly
Thanks, thanks, thanks. It is really inspiring to see that MIX has on its spot SEMCO. I have been researching that company for several years, learning a lot from them. I really invite all to read both books that Polly mentioned. If you are lack of time, read the HBR's articles. There are four by Ricardo Semler. And if you want a collection of companies, including SEMCO, look for the book "Humanistic Management in Practice".
We even brought Ricardo Semler's coleader in his endeavor to Colombia, Joao Vendramim. You can read his presentation at:

http://kuage.ean.edu.co/congresos/sostenibilidad2011/index.php?option=co...

Polly. I am going to put to the students of my Leadership course to review your blog. This one, the Prize by Ricardo Semler, and the one where you talk about Morning Star, W.L. Gore and Whole Foods.

Gracias, gracias, gracias, de nuevo.
Carlos

grant-attwood's picture

Hi Polly. Thanks for this article. I remember reading Maverick and it was really exciting. On the back of your article, I have just ordered the seven day weekend.

I always feel the proof of any management philosophy is in the long term track record of the company.

Your article says: "Semler reports average annual revenue growth at 40% and profitability."

From wikipedia (no citation or supporting documents): "As of 2003, Semco had annual revenue of $212 million, from $4 million in 1982 and $35 million in 1994, with an annual growth rate of UP TO 40 per cent a year."

Based on these numbers I think the average annual growth rate of 20% from 1982 to 1994 and 22% from 1994 to 2003.

There is no mention at all of profit numbers, but I suppose if the business has expanded as Mr Semler says it has then one has to assume it is profitable. But is it more profitable than any other more traditionally run businesses in the same country and industry?

I would really love Mr Semler's ideas to be true - the concept of empowering and engaging employees is a wonderful one. I would just love to see more empirical evidence. I have also tried to find some numbers for the worker's co-operative company, Pendragon, in Spain.

Can anyone assist in finding some empirical evidence of whether employee powered companies are more successful / profitable in the long run than traditional top down companies?

carlos-largacha-martinez's picture

Hi Grant

As I mention in my post to Polly, read "Humanistic Management in Practice" book. You can look at it, even download the introduction to see more at http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?pid=398632. There are 19 companies (including SEMCO and Mongragon) around the world that practices humanistic management, or some sort of practices that puts the human being at the center and renounces to follow only market-oriented decisions. Rather, ethical-oriented decision making is the norm.
If you want to find more, look at the Humanistic Management Center lead by the editor of the book, Ernst von Kimakowitz.at http://www.humanisticmanagement.org/
Good luck,
Carlos

jorge-fantin's picture

Just yesterday I discussed the SEMCO case with my students at an MBA Management course, and when I was about to write an article about this company, I received an email from The Mix Fix with a link to this blog. Chance or causality? Who cares! This is an amazing and inspirational story that every management student should read.

Long gone are those ideas of "maximizing shareholders' value" as the only "raison d' etre" for any manager. Fortunately a new way of dealing with people (customers, employees or neighbours) is emerging and Ricardo Semler's approach is just the tip of the iceberg of a huge change in the making.

Very good article Polly!

nick-sarillo's picture

Polly - This is another great, inspirational story!
I have been following your blogs for a while now, and finally made the time to let you know that I really appreciate this site and your blogs.

I have a two restaurants (Nick's Pizza & Pub) and I love to learn from other business owners what I could do to improve the culture of my organization, and apply that learning. I have been working on running our 350 seat restaurants without a GM, allowing the team to lead eachother. This article inspires me to continue on with this mission, and I will be researching more about Semler to get a deeper understanding.

Thank you,
Nick

david-marquet_1's picture

Exactly right.
"Give control, create leaders" is what we say. That's as opposed to "take control, attract followers."
Great to hear it's being practiced so successfully.
Gareth, thanks for pointing out the book Maverick. ordered.

For more thinking like this, check out leader-leader.com/blog

gareth-jones's picture

I was on my way through an airport in 1994 I picked up a book to read on the trip - that book was Maverick. It's an understatement to say that it completely changed my outlook on life. As an international HR Director at the time, it cut right across everything i was experiencing. But it went straight to my heart. Instinctively I knew he was right.

I was lucky enough to see Ricardo and meet him briefly when he came to the UK for a conference. The audience was mostly CEO's and HR Directors and it was the most hostile audience I think I have ever met. One after the other, the business leaders in the room challenged him, saying he would be out of business in 5 years and that it was impossible to replicate the model outside of Brazil.

His response? He just kept asking "why?". And the more he asked, the more frustrated and angry they became. They realised they were "stuck in a mode they really cant explain" but, as the creators of that 'mode', they realised that they were the problem, not the model.

I must have given over 100 copies of the book away over the years in order to share the thinking. Ultimately, it was the this book that led me to leave the HR profession a few years later, to get out of the world of HR to see the world of work through a commercial lens and to see if it made any difference.

I didn't. My thinking is still the same. And Semco is still going strong, still experimenting, still pioneering. With core principles like these, you really dont need anything else"

1) “trust in adult behavior”—the basic human drive to be productive, to build toward the future, and to contribute to something larger than themselves, and

2) every person’s rhythm’s are different when it comes to when and where and how they do their best work.

It can be done. You just need to be brave enough to let go.

Polly, thank you so much for sharing. I envy you so much for having the opportunity to talk to Ricardo - even if it was via skype ;)

david-zinger's picture

Polly.
Thanks for such a compact overview of Semler and his work. Your writing is both informative and engaging. What stood out in the blog for me was:

"There are no rules when it comes to finding balance. What Semler is after is that uniquely human equilibrium that comes from the right mix of challenging, meaningful work and truly rejuvenating pursuits (as opposed to enervating leisure). That’s the best ground for producing life’s true highs—the exhilaration Semler argues is the whole point of the exercise.

But Semler isn’t simply interested in generating freedom from the constraints of the time clock, the cube, and bureaucratic policies—he’s intent on cultivating the freedom to discover your destiny. That’s why Semco welcomes “trespassers” (individuals, from interns and assistants to heads of businesses to check out meetings and projects as far afield as they fancy) and promotes a “ramble when bored” approach (a very loose and self-directed job-rotation program).

When people are not only free, but actively encouraged, to question, to get up and leave a meeting that bores them, to bop into a meeting that interests them, and to push back on previous conclusions, you actually have a chance to get to the heart of the matter, to escape ruts, and to do something that’s worth doing."

It is so key that we have good models of leadership and workplaces and as we work towards not making them exceptions but exemplars.

David