As an organization grows from few hundred millions to more than a billion, you need people who manage the various groups with a characteristic of a CEO. He/she should be given the freedom to run his portion of business like a CEO runs his own company. The current CEO becomes the "Chairman" - CEO of CEOs.
By doing this, the individual is given the freedom, responsibility, power - all that will help in motivating the him/her to go to the next level.
Organizations grow fast and very often, they do not know how to cope up with the speed of growth. Leaders who can manage 100 individuals will not be able to do the same with 1000.
How does one grow leaders in the same speed (or faster) as the organization?
This hack tries to suggest a way to develop leaders faster.
Solution
Identify a set of Leaders who are well-known, already occupying a range of portfolios
Empower them with responsibilities that a CEO can take
Provide them with the targets to be achieved over a year
Senior Management to have 'Board meetings' every 6 months with each CEO to review progress.
Practical Impact
It gives a very good feeling to the 'CEOs' of the organization. Is it just a title change? No.
All responsibilities of the group are taken by the CEO, whether it is the Investment decisions, Strategy-making, Recruitment processes, etc along with the regular tasks (Sales, Execution).
Once the portfolio is enlarged, the CEO has a larger breadth of vision and starts having a bigger picture. Automatically, the organization gets beneftited by this approach.
Challenges
It is highly possible that the CEO runs the group like a black-box to the rest of the organization. Hence, necessary check-points are necessary to be in place.
A Financial framework has to be defined so that the overall numbers are consolidated easily and quickly.
First Steps
Implement this concept in one of the smaller groups, watch how it pans out and refine the model for the larger organization.
Credits
The organization, Satyam, had followed this principle earlier and it worked. Thanks to the vision of Ramalinga Raju (the fallen emperor), these strategies were implemented. Some points of the vision are captured at http://archives.digitaltoday.in/businesstoday/20061105/cover8.html
Hello Madhusudan
I have read your hack with the following criteria in mind:
- The need is to evolve out of Command & Control. Does the hack define an alternative?
- The alternative must be compelling. It must recognize the need to overcome the constraints of time, energy and motivation.
- An alternative without the use of technology is unlikely to succeed.
- The alternative must create a constructive collective by intrinsic means, i.e., desist from 'brain-washing' personnel for discipline and organization.
Bill Nobles in his hack on Freedom has done tremendous groundwork to arrive at the action promoted by you – the breaking up of Command & Control. Perhaps philosophy is an extremely important ingredient of transformation. Bill has supported his hack with excellent examples of success from where he has developed his philosophy of Freedom and smaller units run by people who will promulgate Freedom. Bill acknowledges that the philosophy of Freedom is quite dependent on the leadership. Thus it is not really intrinsic. Freedom is a great concept but will need something more than missionary zeal to become a movement for transformation.
What is the MIX?
Announcing the first-ever MIX live event: the MIX Mashup—a day-long gathering of the vanguard of management innovators.
Meet the pioneering leaders, courageous experimenters, and agenda-setting thinkers who have taken on the status quo (and won)—and leave inspired and equipped to make an impact in your own organization.
We are opening up this limited-capacity event to the MIX community. Apply to attend here.
Shifting the prevailing view among managers, boards of directors and investors from "quarterly capitalism" to what we call "capitalism for the long term".
Ricardo Semler, the irrepressible force behind Brazil’s Semco Group, turned his company into a laboratory for experimenting with organizational democracy, equity, and engagement.
MIX Maverick John Mackey says to create high-trust organizations we need to create cultural processes, structures and strategies that allow human beings to reach their full potential.
MIX Maverick and Chief Innovation Officer for Dell Services Jim Stikeleather says that for an idea to be innovative it has to be forward-thinking, viable, sustainable, and valuable.
The best bosses understand that their power comes not from maintaining control, but from devising ways to unleash more freedom, creativity, and contribution.
Rohit Kashyap
September 10, 2010 at 3:09amHello Madhusudan
I have read your hack with the following criteria in mind:
- The need is to evolve out of Command & Control. Does the hack define an alternative?
- The alternative must be compelling. It must recognize the need to overcome the constraints of time, energy and motivation.
- An alternative without the use of technology is unlikely to succeed.
- The alternative must create a constructive collective by intrinsic means, i.e., desist from 'brain-washing' personnel for discipline and organization.
Bill Nobles in his hack on Freedom has done tremendous groundwork to arrive at the action promoted by you – the breaking up of Command & Control. Perhaps philosophy is an extremely important ingredient of transformation. Bill has supported his hack with excellent examples of success from where he has developed his philosophy of Freedom and smaller units run by people who will promulgate Freedom. Bill acknowledges that the philosophy of Freedom is quite dependent on the leadership. Thus it is not really intrinsic. Freedom is a great concept but will need something more than missionary zeal to become a movement for transformation.