Madhusudan,
I have seen something like this in IT operations -- departments within an organization and IT service outsourcers. It makes sense not only from the project-management point of view, but also in terms of budgeting since your most talented people will demand the highest wages. The better use you can make of their talents (for example, spreading their wisdom across multiple projects) the better ROI you're getting on your investment in them.
But I have wondered (and wondered again in reading your post) how much it really helps in terms of the efficiency across projects. If you have the same number of talented folks in an organization, aren't they just squeezed even thinner by having to service many projects rather than only one or two at a time? It leads me to think the real solution is better talent management, whether by investing in better training for promising employees or in being even more selective at the hiring stage.
Would be very interested in hearing how you've seen this play out. -- Dave
Madhusudan Rao
June 14, 2010 at 10:39amThanks for your comment David. Regarding efficiency, this is where time-sharing comes in. How you utilize the time of the experts is very essential. You should be careful in not assigning them tasks that can be done by others - by this, not only are you losing his/her valuable time but also making him/her feel frustrated. Of course, one needs to consider if the expert is capable of giving his best to multiple projects. If one cannot focus, makes sense to assign him for one project only. But, we have noticed that true experts have the capabilities to work on multiple projects and give inputs in various ways. How you plan it is key.
Talent Management is also required but as we all know, no amount of training can make people experts to the level we require. Hence, it is very vital for you to use optimal usage of your experts.